Renal Endothelial Cytotoxicity Assay to Diagnose and Monitor Renal Transplant Recipients for Anti-Endothelial Antibodies.

Tissue-specific nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens can play crucial roles in allograft immunity and have been shown to trigger humoral responses leading to rejection of HLA-matched kidney allografts. Interest in the role of endothelial-specific antigens has grown over the past years, and several case reports have been described in which antibodies reacting with endothelial cells (ECs) are associated with rejection. Such antibodies escape the detection in conventional crossmatch tests as they do not react with lymphocytes. However, due to the heterogeneity of endothelial cells from different vascular beds, it remains difficult to draw organ-specific conclusions from studies describing endothelial crossmatch assays. We present a case of a 69-year-old male patient whose kidney allograft was rejected as hyperacute, despite the absence of pretransplant HLA-specific antibodies. To place findings from previous studies in a kidney-related context, we performed crossmatch assays with primary renal endothelial cells. The patient's serum was reactive with primary renal ECs, demonstrated by antibody binding and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Antibodies from this patient did not react with lymphocytes nor were HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) found. Two years later, the patient successfully received a second kidney transplant after treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis before and after transplantation. We demonstrated that the removal of antibodies against non-HLA EC-specific molecules can be monitored using a primary renal EC crossmatch test, possibly contributing to a successful transplantation outcome.

Incidence of recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) hyporesponse, EPO-associated antibodies, and pure red cell aplasia in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Since 1998, an increase of anti-erythropoietin (anti-EPO) antibody-induced pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) has been reported. As data up to now consisted mostly of spontaneously reported cases the question arose about the frequency of this increase in EPO-induced PRCA. The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence and causes of recombinant EPO hyporesponse, of antibodies to EPO in patients on dialysis, and to relate the detection of anti-EPO antibodies to the presence of PRCA. METHOD: This multicenter cohort study used existing patient data and serum samples collected at 6-month intervals from 1677 patients with incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) participating in The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis-2 (NECOSAD-2). RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients had an inadequate EPO response, which resulted in an incidence of 16.7 per 1000 patient-years on EPO while on dialysis. All available sera specimens (N = 232) of these patients were screened for anti-EPO antibodies. The sera specimens of two of these 57 patients tested positive. Of the 57 patients with inadequate EPO response, one had clinical PRCA (incidence 0.29 per 1000 patient-years on EPO and on dialysis). Of the 1346 patients without symptoms of inadequate EPO response, one patient tested borderline positive for anti-EPO antibodies. In total, three patients developed EPO antibodies during follow-up, leading to an estimated incidence of 1.27/1000 (95% CI 0.3 to 3.7/1000) patient-years since the start of dialysis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of inadequate EPO response in our population of dialysis patients is in concordance with tentative calculations found in the literature. Furthermore, we found the incidence of EPO-induced PRCA and EPO antibodies to be low.